Nigerian man sentenced to 4 Years In US Prison for using COVID-19 Pandemic to fraudulently claim Millions Of Dollars
According to a statement made on July 26 by U.S. Attorney Phillip A. Talbert, Nigerian national Olamide Yusuf Bakare, 26, was sentenced to four years and nine months in prison for conspiring to conduct wire fraud during the COVID-19 epidemic.
Bakare entered a guilty plea in January 2023, according to a news release issued on Tuesday by the Eastern District of California’s United States Attorney’s Office.
According to court documents, Bakare conspired with co-defendants Quazeem Owolabi Adeyinka and Ayodeji Jonathan Sangode, among others, between June 2020 and July 2021 to submit false claims for pandemic unemployment assistance (PUA) and unemployment insurance (UI) to the states of Maryland and California.
‘More than 200 individual applications were filed with the California Employment Development Department (EDD) and the Maryland Department of Labor (MDOL) indicating that the claimants’ address was the Hyattsville, Maryland, apartment that the defendants shared.’
‘During the conspiracy, the conspirators obtained the personally identifiable information (PII) of persons who were not eligible for UI or PUA benefits or who did not authorize the conspirators to act on their behalf with respect to seeking such benefits. Such PII included names, dates of birth, and Social Security numbers.’
‘The conspirators then used the PII to submit dozens of fraudulent UI and PUA claims to EDD and MDOL under the putative claimants’ identities and without their authorization.’
‘The underlying benefit applications contained fraudulent representations, including, for example, that the claimants had worked for certain employers and supervisors; had specific annual incomes; worked during certain time periods; were self-employed in various occupations; were laid off and had no work; were newly unemployed due to a disaster including the COVID-19 pandemic; and were currently available to work. Most, if not all, of these claims were false because the claimants were not so previously working, employed, newly unemployed, or seeking new employment.’
‘The conspirators knew that these representations were false or lacked the knowledge and authority to make such representations. These actions caused EDD and MDOL to approve at least 142 fraudulent UI and PUA claims.’
‘For each approved claim, EDD and MDOL deposited benefit funds into a debit card account administered by Bank of America and under the identity of the putative claimant. Bank of America then mailed at least 142 unauthorized debit cards to addresses under the control of the defendants.’
‘Bakare then obtained these debit cards to withdraw cash at ATMs for the benefit of himself and his coconspirators.’
‘During this conspiracy, Bakare also possessed three additional UI debit cards which had been issued by Maine’s Bureau of Unemployment Compensation, North Carolina’s Division of Employment Security, and Nevada’s Department of Employment Training and Rehabilitation.’
‘Each debit card was linked to an account that contained UI benefits. Bakare was not the named beneficiary on the cards or for the associated benefits, and he possessed them with intent to defraud the state agencies.’
‘The debit cards that Bakare possessed and used during the conspiracy were linked to bank accounts that received a total of at least $2,265,844 in fraudulent UI and PUA benefits. He used this money, in part, to purchase a condominium in Lekki, Lagos State, Nigeria for 70 million naira. As part of the sentence, this asset was ordered forfeited.’
‘Adeyinka pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud, and Sangode pleaded guilty to access device fraud. Both are scheduled to be sentenced by U.S. District Judge Dale A. Drozd on Aug. 22, 2023.’
‘Adeyinka faces a maximum statutory penalty of 20 years in prison, and Sangode faces a maximum statutory penalty of 15 years in prison. Their actual sentences, however, will be determined at the discretion of the Court after consideration of any applicable statutory factors and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, which take into account a number of variables.’